Gakis, G; Morgan, T M; Daneshmand, S; Keegan, K A; Todenhöfer, T; Mischinger, J; Schubert, T; Zaid, H B; Hrbacek, J; Ali-El-Dein, B; Clayman, R H; Galland, S; Olugbade, K; Rink, M; Fritsche, H-M; Burger, M; Chang, S S; Babjuk, M; Thalmann, George; Stenzl, A; ... (2015). Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced primary urethral cancer: results of the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma. Annals of oncology, 26(8), pp. 1754-1759. Oxford University Press 10.1093/annonc/mdv230
|
Text
Thalmann_Ann Oncol_Perioperative chemotherapy.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (109kB) | Preview |
BACKGROUND
To investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy in advanced primary urethral carcinoma (PUC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A series of 124 patients (86 men, 38 women) were diagnosed with and underwent surgery for PUC in 10 referral centers between 1993 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was used to investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy on overall survival (OS). The median follow-up was 21 months (mean: 32 months; interquartile range: 5-48).
RESULTS
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (N-CRT) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACH), and ACH was delivered in 12 (31%), 6 (15%) and 21 (54%) of these patients, respectively. Receipt of NAC/N-CRT was associated with clinically node-positive disease (cN+; P = 0.033) and lower utilization of cystectomy at surgery (P = 0.015). The objective response rate to NAC and N-CRT was 25% and 33%, respectively. The 3-year OS for patients with objective response to neoadjuvant treatment (complete/partial response) was 100% and 58.3% for those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.30). Of the 26 patients staged ≥cT3 and/or cN+ disease, 16 (62%) received perioperative chemo(radio)therapy and 10 upfront surgery without perioperative chemotherapy (38%). The 3-year OS for this locally advanced subset of patients (≥cT3 and/or cN+) who received NAC (N = 5), N-CRT (N = 3), surgery-only (N = 10) and surgery plus ACH (N = 8) was 100%, 100%, 50% and 20%, respectively (P = 0.016). Among these 26 patients, receipt of neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with improved 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.022). Proximal tumor location correlated with inferior 3-year RFS and OS (P = 0.056/0.005).
CONCLUSION
In this series, patients who received NAC/N-CRT for cT3 and/or cN+ PUC appeared to demonstrate improved survival compared with those who underwent upfront surgery with or without ACH.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Urology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Thalmann, George |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0923-7534 |
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Katharina Morgenegg |
Date Deposited: |
24 Jun 2015 08:17 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:47 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1093/annonc/mdv230 |
PubMed ID: |
25969370 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
adjuvant; chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy; neoadjuvant; primary urethral carcinoma |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.69764 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/69764 |