Minimally invasive approach to lumbosacral decompression in a cadaveric canine model

Dent, B T; Fosgate, G T; Hettlich, Bianca Felicitas (2016). Minimally invasive approach to lumbosacral decompression in a cadaveric canine model. New Zealand veterinary journal, 64(2), pp. 71-75. Taylor & Francis 10.1080/00480169.2015.1064042

[img] Text
00480169.2015.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

AIMS

To determine efficacy of a minimally invasive (MI) surgical approach using a human MI lumbar retractor for canine lumbosacral dorsal laminectomy and partial discectomy and to compare this technique to the standard open surgical (OS) approach.

METHODS

Lumbosacral dorsal laminectomy and partial discectomy was performed on 16 large-breed canine cadavers using either a standard OS (n=8) or MI (n=8) approach. Skin and fascial incision length, procedure time, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperatively specimens were evaluated for laminectomy and discectomy dimensions, and visible damage to the cauda equina and exiting nerve roots.

RESULTS

Median length of skin and fascial incisions in the OS group were longer than in the MI group (p<0.001). Median laminectomy length was similar between both approaches (p=0.234) but width was greater for the MI than OS approach (p=0.002). Both approaches achieved similar partial discectomy width (p=0.279). Overall surgical time was longer for MI approaches compared to OS, with a median of 18.5 (min 15.5, max 21.8) minutes for MI compared to 14.6 (min 13.1, max 16.9) minutes for OS (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MI approach reduced incision lengths while retaining comparable laminectomy and discectomy dimensions. For this in vitro model the MI approach required more time to complete, but this difference may not be relevant in clinical cases.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dogs undergoing lumbosacral dorsal laminectomy are commonly large-breed dogs. The traditional open approach requires a large skin incision and soft tissue dissection, especially in overweight animals. A MI approach accomplishing the same surgical result while minimising soft tissue trauma could reduce post-operative pain and recovery time, and may lower wound-related complications. Clinical studies are needed to confirm postoperative benefit and assess operating times in vivo.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV)
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > Small Animal Clinic > Small Animal Clinic, Surgery
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > Small Animal Clinic

UniBE Contributor:

Hettlich, Bianca Felicitas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0048-0169

Publisher:

Taylor & Francis

Language:

English

Submitter:

Simone Forterre

Date Deposited:

08 Feb 2016 10:40

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:51

Publisher DOI:

10.1080/00480169.2015.1064042

PubMed ID:

26102063

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Dog, lumbosacral, dorsal laminectomy, minimally invasive surgery, lumbar retractor

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.75142

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/75142

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback