Hunger, Robert; Angermeier, Sarina; Seyed Jafari, Seyed Morteza; Ochsenbein, Adrian; Shafighi, Maziar (2015). A retrospective study of 1- versus 2-cm excision margins for cutaneous malignant melanomas thicker than 2 mm. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 72(6), pp. 1054-1059. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.029
Text
Hunger 7.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (649kB) |
||
|
Text
final One cm excision margin 01.03.2016.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (330kB) | Preview |
BACKGROUND
Most guidelines recommend at least 2-cm excision margin for melanomas thicker than 2 mm.
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated whether 1- or 2-cm excision margins for melanoma (>2 mm) result in different outcomes.
METHODS
This is a retrospective cohort study on patients with melanomas (>2 mm) who underwent tumor excision with 1-cm (228 patients) or 2-cm (97 patients) margins to investigate presence of local recurrences, locoregional and distant metastases, and disease-free and overall survival.
RESULTS
In all, 325 patients with mean age of 61.84 years and Breslow thickness of 4.36 mm were considered for the study with a median follow-up of 1852 days (1995-2012). There was no significant difference in the frequency of locoregional and distant metastasis between the 2 groups (P = .311 and .571). The survival analysis showed no differences for disease-free (P = .800; hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.627-1.433) and overall (P = .951; hazard ratio 1.018; 95% confidence interval 0.575-1.803) survival.
LIMITATIONS
The study was not prospectively randomized.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study did not show any significant differences in important outcome parameters such as local or distant metastases and overall survival. A prospective study testing 1- versus 2-cm excision margin is warranted.