Assessment of Functioning when Conducting Occupational Capacity Evaluations - What is "Evidence-Based"?

Canela, Carlos; Schleifer, Roman; Dube, Anish; Hengartner, Michael P; Ebner, Gerhard; Seifritz, Erich; Liebrenz, Michael (2016). Assessment of Functioning when Conducting Occupational Capacity Evaluations - What is "Evidence-Based"? Psychiatrische Praxis, 43(2), pp. 74-81. Thieme 10.1055/s-0035-1552762

Text s-0035-1552762.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (202kB) | Request a copy

Aim: Occupational capacity evaluations have previously been subject to criticism for lacking in quality and consistency. To the authors' knowledge, there is no clear consensus on the best way to formally assess functioning within capacity evaluations. In this review we investigated different instruments that are used to assess functioning in occupational capacity evaluations. Methods: Systematic review of the literature. Results: Though several instruments that assess functional capacity were found in our search, a specific validated instrument assessing occupational capacity as part of a larger psychiatric evaluation was not found. The limitations of the existing instruments on assessing functional capacity are discussed. Conclusion: Medical experts relying on instruments to conduct functional capacity evaluations should be cognizant of their limitations. The findings call for the development and use of an instrument specifically designed to assess the functional and occupational capacity of psychiatric patients, which is also likely to improve the quality of these reports.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 12 Feb 2016
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item