[William Harvey revisited ]

Steinke, Hubert (2015). [William Harvey revisited ]. Therapeutische Umschau, 72(7), pp. 421-427. Huber 10.1024/0040-5930/a000695

	Text a000695.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (7MB)
Preview	Text 3_Steinke-1.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (56kB) | Preview

William Harvey's discovery of the circulation of the blood is often described as a product of the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Modern research has, however, shown thatHarvey followed the Aristotelian research tradition and thus tried to reveal the purpose of the organs through examination of various animals. His publication of 1628 has to be read as an argument of natural philosophy, or, more precisely, as a series of linked observations, experiments and philosophical reasonings from which the existence of circulation has to be deduced as a logical consequence. Harvey did not consider experiments as superior to philosophical reasoning nor intended he to create a new system of medicine. He believed in the vitality of the heart and the blood and rejected Francis Bacon's empirism and the mechanistic rationalism of Descartes. Harvey's contribution and originality lied less in his single observations and experiments but in the manner how he linked them with critical reasoning and how he accepted, presented and defended the ensuing radical findings.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

792 since deposited on 30 Mar 2016
57 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item