Grabbing or investment? On judging large-scale land acquisitions

Mann, Stephan; Bürgi, Elisabeth (2016). Grabbing or investment? On judging large-scale land acquisitions. Agriculture and human values, 34(1), pp. 41-51. Springer 10.1007/s10460-016-9688-1

[img]
Preview
Text
Bürgi_Grabbing_or_investment_2016.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (826kB) | Preview

Although analyses of large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA) often contain an explicit or implicit normative judgment about such projects, they rarely deduce such judgment from a nuanced balancing of pros and cons. This paper uses assessments about a well-researched LSLA in Sierra Leone to show that a utilitarian approach tends to lead to the conclusion that positive effects prevail, whereas deontological approaches lead to an emphasis on negative aspects. LSLA are probably the most radical land-use change in the history of humankind. This process of radical transformation poses a challenge for balanced evaluations. Thus, we line out a framework that focuses on the options of local residents but sets boundaries of acceptability through the core contents of human rights. In addition, systemic implications of a project need to be regarded.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

10 Strategic Research Centers > Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)

UniBE Contributor:

Bürgi, Elisabeth

ISSN:

0889-048X

Publisher:

Springer

Projects:

[478] Soil governance and land acquisitions originating in Switzerland Official URL

Language:

English

Submitter:

Stephan Schmidt

Date Deposited:

15 Apr 2016 15:27

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s10460-016-9688-1

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.80748

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/80748

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback