External validity of a contemporaneous primary percutaneous coronary intervention trial in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a single-centre investigation.

Spitzer, Ernest; Hadorn, Susanne; Zanchin, Thomas; Yamaji, Kyohei; Moschovitis, Aris; Pilgrim, Thomas; Stortecky, Stefan; Jüni, Peter; Heg, Dik; Windecker, Stephan; Räber, Lorenz (2016). External validity of a contemporaneous primary percutaneous coronary intervention trial in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a single-centre investigation. EuroIntervention, 12(9), pp. 1135-1143. Europa Digital & Publishing 10.4244/EIJV12I9A185

Preview

Text Spitzer EuroIntervention 2016.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (597kB) | Preview

AIMS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) represent the most robust source of evidence-based medicine. However, the generalisability of RCTs is limited by the inclusion of selected populations. We sought to assess the external validity of a contemporary trial including patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients presenting to Bern University Hospital during the inclusion period of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial were divided into three groups: RCT participants (41%), eligible not included (17.5%), and excluded patients (41.5%). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as one-year death and myocardial infarction. RCT participants compared with RCT-eligible patients had comparable baseline characteristics and outcomes; however, excluded patients differed in risk and had higher rates of MACE (HR 3.63, 95% CI: 2.03-6.48, p<0.001), death (HR 6.23, 95% CI: 2.93-13.24, p<0,001) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (HR 3.63, 95% CI: 1.79-7.36, p<0.001). Inability to provide consent was the most frequent exclusion criterion and was independently associated with an increased risk for MACE (HR 6.85, 95% CI: 3.97-11.81, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-centre investigation, results from the COMFORTABLE AMI trial appeared applicable to a broad representation of RCT-eligible patients. However, patients excluded from the trial represented a higher-risk population with impaired clinical outcomes and a lower adherence to cardiovascular medication.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

350 since deposited on 28 Nov 2016
26 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item