EKA survey: diagnosis of prosthetic knee joint infection.

Ahmad, SS; Becker, Roland; Chen, Antonia F; Kohl, S (2016). EKA survey: diagnosis of prosthetic knee joint infection. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 24(10), pp. 3050-3055. Springer 10.1007/s00167-016-4303-y

[img]
Preview
Text
art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-016-4303-y.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (993kB) | Preview

PURPOSE

Due to the juvenility of research in the field of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), approaches employed for diagnosis of PJI vary amongst surgeons in different geographic regions. The aim of this study was to determine common diagnostic approaches utilized by European knee arthroplasty surgeons for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

A task force was established for questionnaire development, consisting of surgeons and clinical researchers who each had a record of publishing in the field of PJI. A pool of items was initially generated from a Medline literature search. These were organized into a file and independently sent to each task force member for evaluation and additional supplementation. After reaching a consensus, a final online version was generated and administered to all 4865 members of the "European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery & Arthroscopy".

RESULTS

There were 262 respondents between August 2015 and March 2016. Most European surgeons (41.1 %) diagnose between 2 and 5 PJIs yearly, and only 5.8 % diagnose >30 PJIs per year. Serum tests to rule out infection were commonly CRP (97.7 %), leucocyte count (73.6 %) and microbiology cultures (45.3 %), while serum interleukins were least common (<5 %). Synovial fluid exams most commonly included microbiology (97.7 %), leucocyte count (74.8 %), percentage polymorphonuclear cells (65.8 %), synovial fluid CRP (26.4 %) and α-defensin (19.4 %). Conventional radiographs represent the most common radiographic exam (87.6 %) followed by SPECT-CT scans (41.7 %). The majority (93.6 %) take biopsies at the time of surgery, 62.0 % take 1-5 biopsies, and 34.9 % take >5. Most biopsies (98.8 %) are sent for culture exams and 72.5 % for histology, and 36.4 % of surgeons send the implants for sonication.

CONCLUSION

Microbiology and cell count remain the most commonly applied synovial fluid tests in Europe, while α-defensin and leucocyte esterase are currently less common. Serum interleukins have not gained widespread use. Implant sonication, despite evidence of diagnostic effectiveness, was only applied by one-third of survey respondents, highlighting the problematic issues of cost and accessibility of some tools. The results highlight the current state of European diagnostic practice, emphasizing the areas of divergence from state of evidence and demonstrating the need for development of standard diagnostic algorithms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional survey, Level IV.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Ahmad, Sufian, Kohl, Sandro

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0942-2056

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Lilianna Bolliger

Date Deposited:

06 Apr 2017 11:15

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:01

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s00167-016-4303-y

PubMed ID:

27637855

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Diagnosis; Diagnostic; Knee infection; Knee replacement; PJI; Prosthetic joint infection; TKA

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.92931

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/92931

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback