Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Borbély, Yves Michael; Plebani, Andrin; Kröll, Dino; Ghisla, Simone; Nett, Philipp C. (2016). Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 12(4), pp. 790-794. Elsevier 10.1016/j.soard.2015.10.084

	Text Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (147kB)
	Text SOARD_2459_CorrYB_print.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (148kB)

BACKGROUND

Gastric resection, short bowel syndrome, and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for development of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Reasons are multifactorial and not completely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of EPI after distal (dRYGB) and proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pRYGB) and to assess the influence of respective limb lengths.

SETTING

University hospital, Switzerland.

METHODS

The study comprised 188 consecutive patients who underwent primary dRYGB (common channel<120 cm, biliopancreatic limb 80-100 cm) or pRYGB (alimentary limb = 155 cm, biliopancreatic limb 40-75 cm) and who were followed-up for at least 2 years. Patients with a history of gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary resection (except for cholecystectomy), postoperative pregnancy, and any revision of RYGB (gastric pouch, limb lengths) were excluded. EPI was defined by clinical symptoms in combination with fecal pancreatic elastase-1<200 μg/g stool or fecal pancreatic elastase-1>200 and<500 μg/g stool and positive dechallenge-rechallenge test with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 52.2 months (range 24-120). Seventy-nine patients (42%) underwent dRYGB, and 109 (58%) underwent pRYGB. Of those, 59 (31%) patients were diagnosed with EPI after a mean 12.5±16.3 months. There was a significant difference between dRYGB and pRYGB groups in initial body mass index (dRYGB 47.1±8.1 kg/m(2) versus pRYGB 42.7±6.1 kg/m(2); P<.01), patients in Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score group C (13% versus 3%; P = .02), and prevalence of EPI (48% versus 19%; P<.01). Neither overall small bowel length nor absolute or relative limb lengths were influencing factors on EPI after dRYGB.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of EPI after dRYGB (48%) and pRYGB (19%) is of clinical importance. There was no significant difference in absolute or relative limb lengths between EPI and non-EPI groups after dRYGB.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

6 since deposited on 29 Mar 2017
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item