Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators.

Pedersen, Tina Heidi; Meuli, Jonas; Plazikowski, Eike Jan; Buttenberg, Maximilian; Kleine-Brüggeney, Maren; Seidl, Christian Andreas; Theiler, Lorenz; Greif, Robert (2017). Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators. European journal of anaesthesiology, 34(9), pp. 602-608. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000640

Text 00003643-201709000-00006.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (328kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Detecting loss of resistance (LOR) can either be taught with dedicated simulators, with a cost ranging from &OV0556;1500 to 3000, or with the 'Greengrocer's Model', requiring simply a banana.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare three dedicated epidural puncture training simulators and a banana in their ability to simulate LOR. Our hypothesis was that there was a difference between the four simulators when comparing the detection of LOR.

DESIGN

Single-blinded, randomised, controlled study.

SETTING

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-five consultant anaesthesiologists.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were asked to insert an epidural catheter in four different epidural puncture training simulators: Lumbar Puncture Simulator II (Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan), Lumbar Epidural Injection Trainer (Erler-Zimmer, Lauf, Germany), Normal Adult Lumbar Puncture/Epidural Tissue (Simulab Corp., Seattle, Washington, USA) and a banana. The simulators were placed in identical boxes to blind the participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the detection of LOR rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, in which 0 mm represented 'completely unrealistic' and 100 mm represented 'indistinguishable from a real patient'.

RESULTS

The mean visual analogue scale scores for LOR in the four simulators were significantly different: 60 ± 25 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 55 to 65 mm], 50 ± 29 mm (95% CI, 44 to 55 mm), 64 ± 24 mm (95% CI, 58 to 69 mm) and 49 ± 32 mm (95% CI, 44 to 54 mm); P less than 0.001, Friedman test.

CONCLUSION

Two of the three dedicated epidural simulators were rated more realistic in detecting LOR than the banana, but some participants preferred the banana to the other three simulators. Given the relative cost of a banana compared with a dedicated simulator, we suggest that a banana be used to teach the technique of LOR for epidural puncture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

KEK Nr: Req-2015-z087.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 25 Oct 2017
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item