Simulated patient-based teaching of medical students improves pre-anaesthetic assessment: A rater-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Berger-Estilita, Joana M; Greif, Robert; Berendonk, Christoph; Stricker, Daniel; Schnabel, Kai P. (2020). Simulated patient-based teaching of medical students improves pre-anaesthetic assessment: A rater-blinded randomised controlled trial. European journal of anaesthesiology, 37(5), pp. 387-393. Wolters Kluwer 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001139

	Text (Page proofs) Berger_Simulated teaching_EJA_2019.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (698kB)
	Text Berger-Estilita_Simulated_patient_based_teaching_EJA_2020.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (176kB)

BACKGROUND

Pre-anaesthetic assessment of patients is a complex competency that needs to be taught during anaesthesia clerkships.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to improve student teaching and investigated the effectiveness of trained 'simulated patients' (lay persons or actors trained to portray specific roles or symptoms) in the teaching of medical students to perform routine pre-anaesthetic assessments. We hypothesised that the intervention of one 30-min teaching sequence with a simulated patient will improve the performance of year 4 medical students in pre-anaesthesia assessment of elective surgical patients, compared with the control of standard apprentice-based teaching.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and forty-four year 4 medical students at the University of Bern.

INTERVENTION

These students were randomised to either the standard clinician-supervised learning in the operating theatre (n=71; control group) or a single teaching session with a simulated patient (nonhealthcare provider, as a trained layperson) (n=73; intervention group). Both groups of students then performed pre-anaesthetic patient visits. The student performances during these visits were assessed according to the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise tool by trained anaesthesiologists blinded to randomisation. The 71 students in the standard clinical supervision group also underwent the simulated patient teaching session on the day following the assessments.

RESULTS

The students in the intervention group of simulated patient teaching scored significantly higher in both their mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise overall impression scores (8.8 ± 0.8 vs. 8.3 ± 0.9; P = 0.004) and mean domain scores (8.7 ± 0.8 vs. 8.3 ± 0.9; P = 0.01), compared with those of the control group with the standard clinical supervision.

CONCLUSION

The current single teaching encounter with a trained layperson acting as a simulated patient improved medical student performances in their pre-anaesthetic clinical assessment of surgical patients. This might be a suitable alternative to reduce the teaching burden for busy and costly clinicians.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

7 since deposited on 20 Jan 2020
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item