CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis.

Nikolakopoulou, Adriani; Higgins, Julian P T; Papakonstantinou, Theodoros; Chaimani, Anna; Del Giovane, Cinzia; Egger, Matthias; Salanti, Georgia (2020). CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis. PLoS medicine, 17(4), e1003082. Public Library of Science 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082

Preview

Text Nikolakopoulou PLoSMed 2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the credibility of results from a meta-analysis has become an important part of the evidence synthesis process. We present a methodological framework to evaluate confidence in the results from network meta-analyses, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA), when multiple interventions are compared.

METHODOLOGY

CINeMA considers 6 domains: (i) within-study bias, (ii) reporting bias, (iii) indirectness, (iv) imprecision, (v) heterogeneity, and (vi) incoherence. Key to judgments about within-study bias and indirectness is the percentage contribution matrix, which shows how much information each study contributes to the results from network meta-analysis. The contribution matrix can easily be computed using a freely available web application. In evaluating imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence, we consider the impact of these components of variability in forming clinical decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Via 3 examples, we show that CINeMA improves transparency and avoids the selective use of evidence when forming judgments, thus limiting subjectivity in the process. CINeMA is easy to apply even in large and complicated networks.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

118 since deposited on 08 Apr 2020
21 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item