Surface roughness of high-performance polymers used for fixed implant-supported prostheses.

Batak, Burcu; Çakmak, Gülce; Johnston, William M.; Yilmaz, Burak (2021). Surface roughness of high-performance polymers used for fixed implant-supported prostheses. The journal of prosthetic dentistry, 126(2), 254.e1-254.e6. Elsevier 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.029

Text Surface_roughness_HPP.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (392kB) | Request a copy

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

High-performance polymers have been recommended by their manufacturers as a framework material for implant-supported fixed prostheses. However, little is known about the surface roughness of high-performance polymers in different compositions and whether they require layering with a composite resin or acrylic resin on the tissue surface.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) high-performance polymers and the effect of polishing on their surface roughness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy high-performance polymer specimens (n=10) for 4 different polyetheretherketone (PEEK) brands (BRE, CP, ZZ, J), 1 polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) (PK), and 2 different fiber-reinforced composite resin (FRC) materials (T, TR) were milled from 7×8×30-mm CAD-CAM blocks. The surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was measured on the same surfaces after milling (baseline) and after polishing by using a contact profilometer. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA (MIXED procedure) and the Bonferroni corrected t test (α=.05) were used to analyze the surface roughness data.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among high-performance polymers when the baseline surface roughness measurements of the materials were compared (P>.05). All materials (BRE, PK, CP, T, TR, ZZ), except for a PEEK material (J) (P<.05), had no significant differences in their surface roughness before and after polishing. After polishing, the surface roughness of the J PEEK material was higher than that of CP, PK, T, and ZZ (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The surface roughness of high-performance polymers in different compositions after milling was similar. Polishing increased the surface roughness of only one PEEK (J) material. All surface roughness values were above the clinical acceptability threshold of 0.2 μm.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 04 May 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item