Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.

Jamjoom, Faris Z; Aldghim, Adhwaa; Aldibasi, Omar; Yilmaz, Burak (2024). Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study. The journal of prosthetic dentistry, 131(6), pp. 1218-1225. Elsevier 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.027

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S0022391323000690-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (924kB) | Preview

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The scanning strategy used when making complete arch digital scans affects the accuracy of the scan, and the accuracy of the strategy may be influenced by the scanner used. However, these effects have not been investigated thoroughly with complete arch edentulous scanning.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of scanning strategies and the scanned arch on the accuracy of complete arch edentulous scans using 2 intraoral scanner (IOS) systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two IOSs were used (TRIOS 4 and Emerald S) to scan maxillary and mandibular typodonts using 6 scanning strategies (test scans), and conventional impressions of both arches were also made. By using a metrology software program, test scans were superimposed onto a reference scan, and the root mean square (RMS) of the absolute deviation values was calculated to express trueness. The sample with the best trueness was used as reference onto which the remaining samples from the same group were superimposed, and the RMS of the absolute deviation values was calculated to express precision. Statistical modeling was applied using the fixed effects models (α=.05).

RESULTS

The main effects of scanner and strategy significantly impacted the trueness RMS values (P<.001), with significant interactions between them (P=.012). The main effects of scanner, strategy, and arch significantly impacted the precision of RMS values (P=.004), (P=.033), and (P=.023). Conventional impressions and the TRIOS 4 scanner had comparable accuracy, while the Emerald S scanner was inferior to both. P-O-B had the highest overall accuracy and strategy ZZ had the worst. Better precision was found with the maxillary arch.

CONCLUSIONS

The scanner type and scanning strategy significantly impacted the accuracy of the digital scans of completely edentulous arches, with a significant interaction between scanner and strategy. The arch being scanned had a significant effect on scan precision but not on scan trueness.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

69 since deposited on 27 Feb 2023
33 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item