Exploration of the Acceptance of the Use of Procalcitonin Point-of-Care Testing and Lung Ultrasonography by General Practitioners to Decide on Antibiotic Prescriptions for Lower Respiratory Infections: A Qualitative Study.

Geis, Daniel; Canova, Nina; Lhopitallier, Loïc; Kronenberg, Andreas; Meuwly, Jean-Yves; Senn, Nicolas; Mueller, Yolanda; Fasseur, Fabienne; Boillat-Blanco, Noémie (2023). Exploration of the Acceptance of the Use of Procalcitonin Point-of-Care Testing and Lung Ultrasonography by General Practitioners to Decide on Antibiotic Prescriptions for Lower Respiratory Infections: A Qualitative Study. BMJ open, 13(5), e063922. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063922

[img]
Preview
Text
e063922.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (640kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore the acceptance and opinions of general practitioners (GPs) on the use of procalcitonin point-of-care and lung ultrasonography for managing patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. We suppose that there are several factors that can influence the physician's antibiotic prescribing decision, and the implementation of a new tool will only be possible when it can be inserted into the physician's daily practice, helping him/her in the decision-making process.

DESIGN

Semistructured interviews; data analysis using the grounded theory method.

SETTING

Lausanne, Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

12 GPs who participated in the randomised clinical trial UltraPro, which evaluated the impact of the use of procalcitonin only or an algorithm combining procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography on antibiotic prescription.

RESULTS

GPs had mostly positive attitudes towards the use of point-of-care procalcitonin in lower respiratory tract infections and uncertainties regarding the usefulness of ultrasonography. Physicians' prescribing decisions result from interactions between three kinds of TrustS (core category): 'self-confidence', 'trust in the results' and 'trust in the doctor-patient relationship'. Procalcitonin reinforced the three levels of trust, while ultrasonography only strengthened the physician-patient relationship. To facilitate implementation of procalcitonin, physicians pointed out the need of coverage by insurance and of clear guidelines describing the targeted patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that there is a preference for the implementation of procalcitonin rather than lung ultrasonography for the management of patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. Coverage by insurance plans and updated guidelines are prerequisite to the successful implementation of procalcitonin testing in primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03191071.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute for Infectious Diseases > Research
04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute for Infectious Diseases

UniBE Contributor:

Kronenberg, Andreas Oskar

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2044-6055

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

12 May 2023 15:04

Last Modified:

21 May 2023 02:26

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063922

PubMed ID:

37169498

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Clinical trials GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine) QUALITATIVE RESEARCH RESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine) Respiratory infections Ultrasound

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/182508

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/182508

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback