Effect of number of supports and build angle on the fabrication and internal fit accuracy of additively manufactured definitive resin-ceramic hybrid crowns.

Çakmak, Gülce; Jutzi, Dino; Donmez, Mustafa Borga; Kahveci, Çiğdem; de Paula, Marcella Silve; Schimmel, Martin; Yilmaz, Burak (2023). Effect of number of supports and build angle on the fabrication and internal fit accuracy of additively manufactured definitive resin-ceramic hybrid crowns. Journal of dentistry, 134(104548), p. 104548. Elsevier Science 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104548

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S0300571223001343-main.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of number of supports and build angle on the fabrication and internal fit accuracy (trueness and precision) of additively manufactured resin-ceramic hybrid crowns.

METHODS

A mandibular first molar crown was designed and nested on the build platform of a printer either with a 30° angle between the occlusal surface and the build platform (BLS (less support) and BMS (more support)) or its occlusal surface parallel to the build platform (VLS (less support) and VMS (more support)) to fabricate additively manufactured resin-ceramic hybrid crowns (n=14). After fabrication, supports were removed by a blinded operator and all crowns were digitized with an intraoral scanner. Fabrication accuracy (overall, external, intaglio occlusal, occlusal, and marginal) was evaluated by using root mean square (RMS) method, while internal fit was evaluated with triple scan method. RMS, average gap, and precision of these data were analyzed (α= .05).

RESULTS

VLS had higher overall deviations than BLS and VMS (P≤.039). VMS had higher occlusal deviations than BLS (P=.033). While BMS and BLS had higher marginal deviations than VLS (P≤.006), BMS also had higher values than VMS (P=.012). BLS led to higher precision than VMS (intaglio occlusal and occlusal surfaces) and VLS (occlusal surface) (P≤.008). VLS led to higher precision than BMS (marginal surface) (P=.027). Average gap values were similar (P=.723); however, BLS resulted in higher precision than VLS (P=.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering their high marginal and occlusal surface trueness, and similar internal occlusal deviations and average gaps (trueness), clinical fit of resin-ceramic hybrid crowns fabricated with tested parameters may be similar. Reduced number of supports and angled orientation may lead to higher precision of fit.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tested resin-ceramic hybrid-printer pair may be used to fabricate crowns with reduced number of supports to maintain occlusal surface integrity without compromising the fabrication accuracy and fit.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Cakmak, Gülce, Dönmez, Mustafa-Borga, Schimmel, Martin, Yilmaz, Burak

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0300-5712

Publisher:

Elsevier Science

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

17 May 2023 11:20

Last Modified:

09 Jun 2023 00:16

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104548

PubMed ID:

37192693

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Additive manufacturing build angle definitive composite resin fabrication trueness support

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/182649

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/182649

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback