Pathologist computer-aided diagnostic scoring of tumor cell fraction: A Swiss national study.

Frei, Ana Leni; Oberson, Raphaël; Baumann, Elias; Perren, Aurel; Grobholz, Rainer; Lugli, Alessandro; Dawson, Heather; Abbet, Christian; Lertxundi, Ibai; Reinhard, Stefan; Mookhoek, Aart; Feichtinger, Johann; Sarro, Rossella; Gadient, Gallus; Dommann-Scherrer, Corina; Barizzi, Jessica; Berezowska, Sabina; Glatz, Katharina; Dertinger, Susanne; Banz, Yara; ... (2023). Pathologist computer-aided diagnostic scoring of tumor cell fraction: A Swiss national study. Modern pathology, 36(12), p. 100335. Springer Nature 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100335

Text 1-s2.0-S0893395223002405-main.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to registered users only until 22 September 2024. Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (31MB) | Request a copy

Tumor cell fraction (TCF) estimation is a common clinical task with well-established large inter-observer variability. It thus provides an ideal testbed to evaluate potential impacts of employing a computer-aided diagnostic (TCFCAD) tool to support pathologists' evaluation. During a National Slide Seminar event, pathologists (n=69) were asked to visually estimate TCF in 10 regions of interest (ROI) from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) colorectal cancer images intentionally curated for diverse tissue compositions, cellularity, and stain intensities. Next, they re-evaluated the same ROIs while being provided a TCFCAD created overlay highlighting predicted tumor versus non-tumor cells, together with the corresponding TCF percentage. Participants also reported confidence levels in their assessments using a 5-tiers scale, indicating no confidence to high confidence, respectively. The TCF ground truth (GT) was defined by manual cell-counting by experts. When assisted, inter-observer variability significantly decreased, showing estimates converging to the GT. This improvement remained even when TCFCAD predictions deviated slightly from the GT. The standard-deviation of estimated TCF to the GT across ROIs was 9.9% vs 5.8% with TCFCAD, p < 0.0001. The intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.8 to 0.93 (CI95% [0.65, 0.93] vs [0.86, 0.98]) and pathologists stated feeling more confident when aided (3.67 ± 0.81 vs. 4.17 ± 0.82 with CAD). TCFCAD estimation support demonstrated improved scoring accuracy, inter-pathologist agreement and scoring confidence. Interestingly, pathologists also expressed more willingness to use such a CAD tool at the end of the survey, highlighting the importance of training/education to increase adoption of CAD systems.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 25 Sep 2023
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item