Recombinant C1 inhibitor in the prevention of severe COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, multi-center phase IIa trial.

Urwyler, Pascal; Leimbacher, Marina; Charitos, Panteleimon; Moser, Stephan; Heijnen, Ingmar A F M; Trendelenburg, Marten; Thoma, Reto; Sumer, Johannes; Camacho-Ortiz, Adrián; Bacci, Marcelo R; Huber, Lars C; Stüssi-Helbling, Melina; Albrich, Werner C; Sendi, Parham; Osthoff, Michael (2023). Recombinant C1 inhibitor in the prevention of severe COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, multi-center phase IIa trial. Frontiers in immunology, 14(1255292), p. 1255292. Frontiers Research Foundation 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1255292

Preview

Text fimmu-14-1255292.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Conestat alfa (ConA), a recombinant human C1 inhibitor, may prevent thromboinflammation.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, multi-national clinical trial in which hospitalized adults at risk for progression to severe COVID-19 were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 3 days of ConA plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. Primary and secondary endpoints were day 7 disease severity on the WHO Ordinal Scale, time to clinical improvement within 14 days, and safety, respectively.

RESULTS

The trial was prematurely terminated because of futility after randomization of 84 patients, 56 in the ConA and 28 in the control arm. At baseline, higher WHO Ordinal Scale scores were more frequently observed in the ConA than in the control arm. On day 7, no relevant differences in the primary outcome were noted between the two arms (p = 0.11). The median time to defervescence was 3 days, and the median time to clinical improvement was 7 days in both arms (p = 0.22 and 0.56, respectively). Activation of plasma cascades and endothelial cells over time was similar in both groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the intervention arm (any AE, 30% with ConA vs. 19% with SOC alone; serious AE, 27% vs. 15%; death, 11% vs. 0%). None of these were judged as being related to the study drug.

CONCLUSION

The study results do not support the use of ConA to prevent COVID-19 progression.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04414631.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

17 since deposited on 15 Nov 2023
17 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item