Kaya, Asli; Hamza, Blend; Al-Haj Husain, Nadin; Mätzener, Kiren J; Özcan, Mutlu (2024). Adhesion of tooth fragment after trauma: effect of adhesion strategy and storage in the rescue box. Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 48(2), pp. 19-25. Journal of Pedodontics Inc. 10.22514/jocpd.2024.030
|
Text
JOCPD2023070901.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (3MB) | Preview |
This study aims to investigate the impact of storage conditions for crown fragments (specifically, whether they were stored within a tooth rescue box or in tap water) on their adhesion to fractured teeth when subjected to two different adhesive systems (namely, total etch and self etch). Sixty maxillary premolars were sectioned to obtain tooth fragments. These fragments were stored briefly (2 hours) and reattached in the following groups: Group 1 (fragments stored in tooth rescue box and reattached with etch and rinse (E&R) technique), Group 2 (fragments stored in tap water and reattached with E&R technique), Group 3 (fragments stored in tooth rescue box and reattached with self-etch (SE) technique), and Group 4 (fragments stored in tap water and reattached SE technique). After reattachment, the bonded tooth fragments underwent thermal cycling (500 cycles, 5-55 °C) and bond strength testing using a universal testing machine. Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's tests were used for bond strength comparison (p ≤ 0.05). A two-parameter Weibull distribution was conducted to evaluate the reliability of the storage medium and adhesion modality on bond strength. The results showed that measured shear bond values (MPa ± Standard deviation (SD); arranged in descending order) for each group were: Group 2 (Tap water/E&R = 6.5 ± 2.1), Group 1 (Rescue box/E&R = 6.0 ± 2.5), Group 4 (Tap water/E&R = 5.1 ± 2.8), and Group 3 (Rescue box/SE = 3.6 ± 3.2). Significant differences were found only between Groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.002). In conclusion, storing crown fragments in a tooth rescue box did not significantly affect the shear bond strength of the restored tooth. However, fragments reattached using the self-etch technique showed comparable shear bond strength but a higher rate of adhesive failures compared to the E&R technique.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin |
ISSN: |
1053-4628 |
Publisher: |
Journal of Pedodontics Inc. |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
02 Apr 2024 13:05 |
Last Modified: |
03 Apr 2024 15:52 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.22514/jocpd.2024.030 |
PubMed ID: |
38548629 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Adhesion Adhesive resin Dental materials Dental trauma Pediatric dentistry Storage medium Tooth rescue box |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/195293 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/195293 |