Not all financial speculation is treated equally: Laypeople’s moral judgments about speculative short selling

Lotz, Sebastian; Fix, Andrea R. (2013). Not all financial speculation is treated equally: Laypeople’s moral judgments about speculative short selling. Journal of Economic Psychology, 37, pp. 34-41. Elsevier

Text Not all financial speculation is treated equally_SL_ARF_Journal of Economic Psychology_37_2013.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (381kB)

Since the recent financial crisis, regulators and the general public have focused on financial speculation as one of its potential causes. In addition to the roles played by rating agencies and complicated financial engineering, speculative short sales have been put into question. However, laypeople’s moral judgments about this type of financial speculation have rarely been investigated in economic psychology. The present study aims to fill this gap. Across four studies, we find that laypeople’s moral judgments of short selling are significantly harsher than their judgments of long positions. Both successful (Study 1) and unsuccessful (Study 2) short selling receives harsher moral judgments. In addition, studies which manipulate the moral character of the shorted asset (Study 3) or the time horizon of the investment strategy (Study 4) support the conclusion that short selling is considered less moral than taking a similar long position. The results present consistent support for a judgment bias of economic laypeople in the domain of financial economics.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

4 since deposited on 07 Mar 2018
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item