Rammsayer, Thomas; Pichelmann, Stefan (2018). Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 71(11), pp. 2364-2377. Sage 10.1177/1747021817741611
Text
Rammsayer & Pichelmann 2018.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (161kB) |
The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing, duration discrimination of longer intervals is predicted to require more and more amodal, higher order cognitive resources and decreasing input from the sensory-automatic timing system with increasing interval duration. In two duration discrimination experiments with sensory modality as a within- and a between-subjects variable, respectively, we tested two decisive predictions derived from the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis: (1) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were expected to be larger for brief intervals in the tens-of-milliseconds range than for longer ones, and (2) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of longer intervals should disappear when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. In both experiments, visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were larger for the brief than for the longer intervals. Furthermore, visual-auditory differences observed with longer intervals disappeared when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. Thus, our findings clearly confirmed the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology 07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Personality Psychology, Differential Psychology and Diagnostics |
UniBE Contributor: |
Rammsayer, Thomas, Pichelmann, Stefan |
Subjects: |
100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 370 Education |
ISSN: |
1747-0218 |
Publisher: |
Sage |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Karin Dubler |
Date Deposited: |
13 May 2019 14:23 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:27 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1177/1747021817741611 |
PubMed ID: |
30362412 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.127562 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/127562 |