Good Fun: Cecily Chaumpaigne and the Ethics of Chaucerian Obscenity

Flannery, Mary C. (2021). Good Fun: Cecily Chaumpaigne and the Ethics of Chaucerian Obscenity. The Chaucer review : a journal of medieval studies and literary criticism, 56(4), pp. 360-377. Pennsylvania State University Press 10.5325/chaucerrev.56.4.0360

Text chaucerrev.56.4.0360.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (2MB) | Request a copy

This essay examines the interplay between enjoyment of Chaucer’s obscene
humor (particularly in the Canterbury Tales) and scholarly interpretations of the most troubling episode from Chaucer’s life: Cecily Chaumpaigne’s accusations of raptus. It argues that, because scholars and readers are determined to protect their ability to enjoy Chaucer’s work freely, they often allow their views of Chaucer as a bawdy humorist to infiltrate their discussions of the Chaumpaigne case. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s figure of the “feminist killjoy,” this essay concludes with the suggestion that we approach Chaucer’s work and biography with the willingness to think critically about our enjoyment of his work, and how it might affect our judgment of the poet himself.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 04 Jun 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item