Multi-model ensembles in climate science: mathematical structures and expert judgements

Jebeile, Julie; Crucifix, Michel (2020). Multi-model ensembles in climate science: mathematical structures and expert judgements. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 83, pp. 44-52. Elsevier 10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.03.001

Preview	Text 2020_Jebeile_Crucifix__SHPS__Multi-model_ensembles_in_climate_science_mathematical_representations_and_expert_judgements.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (205kB) | Preview
	Text 1-s2.0-S0039368119301864-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (510kB) | Request a copy

Projections of future climate change cannot rely on a single model. It has become common to rely on multiple simulations generated by Multi-Model Ensembles (MMEs), especially to quantify the uncertainty about what would constitute an adequate model structure. But, as Parker points out (2018), one of the remaining philosophically interesting questions is: “How can ensemble studies be designed so that they probe uncertainty in desired ways?” This paper offers two interpretations of what General Circulation Models are and how MMEs should be designed. In the first interpretation, models are combinations of modules and parameterisations; an MME is obtained by “plugging and playing” with interchangeable modules and parameterisations. In the second interpretation, models are aggregations of expert judgements that result from a history of epistemic decisions made by scientists about the choice of representations; an MME is a sampling of expert judgements from modelling teams. We argue that, while the two interpretations involve distinct philosophical tools, they both could be used in a complementary manner in order to explore ways of designing better MMEs.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

7 since deposited on 09 Jun 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item