Effects of using a cognitive aid on content and feasibility of debriefings of simulated emergencies.

Freytag, Julia; Stroben, Fabian; Hautz, Wolf E.; Penders, Dorothea; Kämmer, Juliane E. (2021). Effects of using a cognitive aid on content and feasibility of debriefings of simulated emergencies. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 38(5), Doc95. German Medical Science 10.3205/zma001491

[img]
Preview
Text
zma001491.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (3MB) | Preview

Background: Adverse events in patient care are often caused by failures in teamwork. Simulation training and its debriefing can contribute to improving teamwork and thus patient care. When conducting debriefings, there are several design factors that can potentially influence learning outcomes. This study examines the use of a cognitive aid to help structure the content of debriefings and compares it with debriefings that are merely roughly structured. In addition, the feasibility of the debriefing, the satisfaction of the participants and their teamwork during the training are investigated.
Methods: In a simulated night shift, seven teams of four to five medical students (n=32) took part in six cases that simulated common situations in an emergency medicine environment and received a debriefing on their teamwork after each case, either in the intervention condition with the help of the TeamTAG tool - a cognitive aid focusing on selected teamwork principles from Crisis Resource Management (CRM) - or in the control condition without it. The facilitators noted the topics of the debriefings and rated their experience of conducting them; the participants indicated their satisfaction with the debriefings, as well as their assessment of the importance of CRM principles. In addition, the quality of teamwork was assessed using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).
Results: The analysis showed no difference in the number of teamwork principles discussed between the control and intervention conditions, but topics were repeated more frequently in the control group. The TeamTAG guideline was focused on and implemented by the tutors, who discussed the CRM principles included in the TeamTAG more consistently than in the control condition. The tutors in both conditions were satisfied with the implementation, and the use of TeamTAG facilitated time management. There were no differences in participants' satisfaction, their assessment of the importance of the teamwork principles, or the quality of teamwork between conditions.
Conclusion: The use of a cognitive aid can help to direct the focus on certain topics or learning objectives and facilitate time management through pre-structuring; however, a difference in learning outcomes (in terms of the quality of teamwork) could not be identified. Besides the influence of a certain structure or script, a strong influence from the individual guiding the debriefing is likely.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > University Emergency Center

UniBE Contributor:

Hautz, Wolf, Kämmer, Juliane Eva

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2366-5017

Publisher:

German Medical Science

Language:

English

Submitter:

Romana Saredi

Date Deposited:

08 Dec 2021 10:46

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:55

Publisher DOI:

10.3205/zma001491

PubMed ID:

34286075

Additional Information:

The German version can be found at: http://www.egms.de/de/journals/zma/2021-38/zma001491.shtml

Uncontrolled Keywords:

cognitive aid non-technical skills simulation-based education structured debriefing teamwork

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/161922

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/161922

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback