Adherence to Antiseizure vs Other Medications Among US Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Epilepsy.

Terman, Samuel Waller; Kerr, Wesley T; Aubert, Carole E; Hill, Chloe E; Marcum, Zachary A; Burke, James F (2022). Adherence to Antiseizure vs Other Medications Among US Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Epilepsy. Neurology, 98(4), e427-e436. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013119

[img]
Preview
Text
Terman_Neurology_2021_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (3MB) | Preview
[img] Text
Terman_Neurology_2022.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (533kB)

OBJECTIVE

To 1) compare adherence to antiseizure medications (ASMs) versus non-ASMs among individuals with epilepsy, 2) assess the degree to which variation in adherence is due to differences between individuals versus between medication classes among individuals with epilepsy, and 3) compare adherence in individuals with versus without epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare. We included beneficiaries with epilepsy (≥1 ASM, plus International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes), and a 20% random sample without epilepsy. Adherence for each medication class was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) in 2013-2015. We used Spearman correlation coefficients, Cohen's kappa statistics, and multilevel logistic regressions.

RESULTS

There were 83,819 beneficiaries with epilepsy. Spearman correlation coefficients between ASM PDCs and each of the 5 non-ASM PDCs ranged 0.44-0.50, Cohen's kappa ranged 0.33-0.38, and within-person differences between each ASM's PDC minus each non-ASM's PDC were all statistically significant (p<0.01) though median differences were all very close to 0. Fifty-four percent of variation in adherence across medications was due to differences between individuals. Adjusted predicted probabilities of adherence were: ASMs 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73%-74%), proton pump inhibitors 74% (95% CI 74%-74%), antihypertensives 77% (95% CI 77%-78%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors 77% (95% CI 77%-78%), statins 78% (95% CI 78%-79%), and levothyroxine 82% (95% CI 81%-82%). Adjusted predicted probabilities of adherence to non-ASMs were 80% (95% CI 80%-81%) for beneficiaries with epilepsy versus 77% (77%-77%) for beneficiaries without epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Among individuals with epilepsy, ASM and non-ASM adherence were moderately correlated, half of variation in adherence was due to between-person rather than between-medication differences, adjusted adherence was slightly lower for ASMs than several non-ASMs, and epilepsy was associated with a quite small increase in adherence to non-ASMs. Nonadherence to ASMs may provide an important cue to the clinician to inquire about adherence to other potentially life-prolonging medications as well. Although efforts should focus on improving ASM adherence, patient-level rather than purely medication-specific behaviors are also critical to consider when developing interventions to optimize adherence.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Aubert, Carole Elodie

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0028-3878

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Funders:

[4] Swiss National Science Foundation

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

15 Dec 2021 09:14

Last Modified:

13 Dec 2022 00:25

Publisher DOI:

10.1212/WNL.0000000000013119

PubMed ID:

34893556

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/162440

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/162440

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback