Züst, Marc Alain (2024). Dismissing the role of the hippocampus in implicit memory is special pleading. Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), pp. 83-84. Taylor & Francis 10.1080/17588928.2024.2343663
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Dismissing_the_role_of_the_hippocampus_in_implicit_memory_is_special_pleading.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (419kB) |
Steinkrauss and Slotnick (this issue) argue against hippocampal involvement in implicit memory, bringing up some important considerations. Their critique, however, exhibits significant flaws. The argumentation is based on an ill-defined key concept of 'implicit memory,' and important theoretical context is missed. Potential confounds are brought to bear against a rather narrow selection of studies, often without explaining how exactly the studies are biased. Refining the conceptual scope, including a broader range of literature, and arguing more inclusively would provide more nuanced insights into the hippocampus's role in implicit memory.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Further Contribution) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Psychiatric Services > University Hospital of Geriatric Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
UniBE Contributor: |
Züst, Marc |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 370 Education |
ISSN: |
1758-8936 |
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
23 Apr 2024 09:57 |
Last Modified: |
31 May 2024 00:14 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1080/17588928.2024.2343663 |
PubMed ID: |
38647224 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Implicit memory critique hippocampus rebuttal |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/196168 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/196168 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |