Automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans using deep learning.

Satir, Osman Berk; Eghbali, Pezhman; Becce, Fabio; Goetti, Patrick; Meylan, Arnaud; Rothenbühler, Kilian; Diot, Robin; Terrier, Alexandre; Büchler, Philippe (2024). Automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans using deep learning. (In Press). European journal of radiology, 177(111588), p. 111588. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111588

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S0720048X24003048-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (8MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate an open-source deep learning model for automatically quantifying scapular and glenoid morphology using CT images of normal subjects and patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, we used deep learning to segment the scapula from CT images and then to identify the location of 13 landmarks on the scapula, 9 of them to establish a coordinate system unaffected by osteoarthritis-related changes, and the remaining 4 landmarks on the glenoid cavity to determine the glenoid size and orientation in this scapular coordinate system. The glenoid version, glenoid inclination, critical shoulder angle, glenopolar angle, glenoid height, and glenoid width were subsequently measured in this coordinate system. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed to evaluate the performance of this approach on 60 normal/non-osteoarthritic and 56 pathological/osteoarthritic scapulae.

RESULTS

The Dice similarity coefficient between manual and automatic scapular segmentations exceeded 0.97 in both normal and pathological cases. The average error in automatic scapular and glenoid landmark positioning ranged between 1 and 2.5 mm and was comparable between the automatic method and human raters. The automatic method provided acceptable estimates of glenoid version (R2 = 0.95), glenoid inclination (R2 = 0.93), critical shoulder angle (R2 = 0.95), glenopolar angle (R2 = 0.90), glenoid height (R2 = 0.88) and width (R2 = 0.94). However, a significant difference was found for glenoid inclination between manual and automatic measurements (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This open-source deep learning model enables the automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 01 Jul 2024
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item