Turella, S; Dankiewicz, J; Ben-Hamouda, N; Bernhard Nilsen, K; Düring, J; Endisch, C; Engstrøm, M; Flügel, D; Gaspard, N; Grejs, A M; Haenggi, M.; Haffey, S; Imbach, L; Johnsen, B; Kemlink, D; Leithner, C; Legriel, S; Lindehammar, H; Mazzon, G; Nielsen, N; ... (2024). EEG for good outcome prediction after cardiac arrest: a multicentre cohort study. Resuscitation, 202, p. 110319. Elsevier 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110319
|
Text
1-s2.0-S0300957224002132-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview |
AIM
Assess the prognostic ability of a non-highly malignant and reactive EEG to predict good outcome after cardiac arrest (CA).
METHODS
Prospective observational multicentre substudy of the "Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial", also known as the TTM2-trial. Presence or absence of highly malignant EEG patterns and EEG reactivity to external stimuli were prospectively assessed and reported by the trial sites. Highly malignant patterns were defined as burst-suppression or suppression with or without superimposed periodic discharges. Multimodal prognostication was performed 96 hours after CA. Good outcome at 6 months was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3.
RESULTS
873 comatose patients at 59 sites had an EEG assessment during the hospital stay. Of these, 283 (32%) had good outcome. EEG was recorded at a median of 69 hours (IQR 47-91) after CA. Absence of highly malignant EEG patterns was seen in 543 patients of whom 255 (29% of the cohort) had preserved EEG reactivity. A non-highly malignant and reactive EEG had 56% (CI 50-61) sensitivity and 83% (CI 80-86) specificity to predict good outcome. Presence of EEG reactivity contributed (p<0.001) to the specificity of EEG to predict good outcome compared to only assessing background pattern without taking reactivity into account.
CONCLUSION
Nearly one-third of comatose patients resuscitated after CA had a non-highly malignant and reactive EEG that was associated with a good long-term outcome. Reactivity testing should be routinely performed since preserved EEG reactivity contributed to prognostic performance.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurology 04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care |
UniBE Contributor: |
Hänggi, Matthias, Zubler, Frédéric |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1873-1570 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
22 Jul 2024 12:27 |
Last Modified: |
13 Sep 2024 00:14 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110319 |
PubMed ID: |
39029579 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Cardiac arrest Coma EEG Outcome Prognosis Reactivity |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/199115 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199115 |