A Matter of Perspective? Disentangling the Emic−Etic Debate in the Scientific Study of Religion\s

Mostowlansky, Till; Rota, Andrea (2016). A Matter of Perspective? Disentangling the Emic−Etic Debate in the Scientific Study of Religion\s. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 28(4-5), pp. 317-336. Brill 10.1163/15700682-12341367

Text 15700682_12341367_text.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (584kB) | Request a copy

This article introduces the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s and provides a frame for the special issue’s six articles on the topic. Departing from the broader debate’s early history in the 1960s, this article contextualizes the emic–etic debate and locates its point of entry into the scientific study of religion\s in the 1980s. This article argues that in the course of the debate the insider–outsider and emic–etic complexes have become entangled. In order to facilitate an understanding of the debate, this article maintains that the emic–etic debate in the scientific study of religion\s touches upon three central dimensions (existential–political, methodologi- cal, and epistemological). In order to move toward a clearer methodological and epis- temological framework, this article furthermore proposes an iterative model that locates insider–outsider at the level of observers and emic–etic at the level of categories.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

6 since deposited on 07 Dec 2015
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item