Schlaufer, Caroline (2018). The contribution of evaluations to the discourse quality of newspaper content. Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, pp. 157-165. Elsevier 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.09.006
Text
1-s2.0-S0149718916301227-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (476kB) |
This research shows how the use of evaluations in newspaper articles contributes to the quality of public media discourse prior to direct-democratic votes. Data from Swiss direct-democratic campaigns on school policy between 2000 and 2012 are used to compare newspaper articles that contain evaluations with those that do not refer to evaluations. Results show that those newspaper articles containing evaluations exhibit higher levels of justification, reciprocity and respect, tend to argue in terms of the common good, and contain less storytelling than newspaper articles that do not refer to evaluations. Implications for public deliberation and evaluation practice are discussed.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
09 Interdisciplinary Units > Centre for University Continuing Education |
UniBE Contributor: |
Schlaufer, Caroline Lea |
Subjects: |
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 370 Education |
ISSN: |
0149-7189 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Caroline Lea Schlaufer |
Date Deposited: |
20 Mar 2017 08:58 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:01 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.09.006 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Evaluation use; Political use; Discourse quality; Direct-democratic campaigns; Mediated deliberation; School policy |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.93401 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/93401 |