Do non-native and unfamiliar accents sound less credible? An examination of the processing fluency hypothesis

Wetzel, Mathis; Zufferey, Sandrine; Gygax, Pascal (2021). Do non-native and unfamiliar accents sound less credible? An examination of the processing fluency hypothesis. Journal of articles in support of the null hypothesis, 17(2), pp. 61-70. Reysen Group

Text Vol17-No2-article3.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (401kB) | Request a copy

Many studies have demonstrated that stimuli that are easy to process are generally better evaluated compared to stimuli that are harder to process. It is, however, an open question whether people speaking with a foreign accent are judged to be less truthful compared to native speakers due to the greater difficulty of decoding their speech. In this paper, we provide new data to this debate by comparing the credibility of speakers of French, both with a familiar or unfamiliar native accent, and with a familiar and unfamiliar foreign accent. Our results indicate that native Native-speakers do not evaluate statements uttered with a foreign-accent as less
truthful compared to a native one.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 15 Apr 2021
1 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item