Emic and Etic

Mostowlansky, Till; Rota, Andrea (2020). Emic and Etic. In: Stein, F.; Lazar, S.; Candea, M.; Diemberger, H.; Robbins, J.; Sanchez, A.; Stasch, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: University of Cambridge 10.29164/20emicetic

Preview

Text till_mostowlansky_andrea_rota-2020-emic_and_etic-cea.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (178kB) | Preview

The emic/etic distinction originated in linguistics in the 1950s to designate two complementary standpoints for the analysis of human language and behaviour. It has been subject to debates in the humanities and social sciences ever since. Imported into anthropology in the 1960s, etic came to stand for ambitions to establish an objective, scientific approach to the study of culture, whereas emic refers to the goal of grasping the world according to one’s interlocutors’ particular points of view. While the distinction lost traction as an analytical instrument in anthropology in the 1990s, emic and etic have become concepts used by various other disciplines and subfields in the humanities and social sciences. In these contexts, they continue to be used to address a range of different epistemological and methodological issues, such as the relationship between researcher and research subject or the question of how to legitimately interpret social practices. For this reason, the emic/etic distinction remains relevant. It draws attention to fundamental differences in the way scholars and students of various disciplines approach and discuss research, data, and comparison.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2060 since deposited on 12 May 2021
1351 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item