Do executive attentional processes uniquely or commonly explain psychometric g and correlations in the positive manifold? A structural equation modeling and network-analysis approach to investigate the Process Overlap Theory

Troche, Stefan J.; Von Gugelberg, Helene M.; Pahud, Olivier; Rammsayer, Thomas H. (2021). Do executive attentional processes uniquely or commonly explain psychometric g and correlations in the positive manifold? A structural equation modeling and network-analysis approach to investigate the Process Overlap Theory. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3), p. 37. MDPI 10.3390/jintelligence9030037

Preview

Text Troche_et_al_2021__POT_vs_g_.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (954kB) | Preview

One of the best-established findings in intelligence research is the pattern of positive
correlations among various intelligence tests. Although this so-called positive manifold became the conceptual foundation of many theoretical accounts of intelligence, the very nature of it has remained unclear. Only recently, Process Overlap Theory (POT) proposed that the positive manifold originated from overlapping domain-general, executive processes. To test this assumption, the functional relationship between different aspects of executive attention and the positive manifold was investigated by re-analyzing an existing dataset (N = 228). Psychometric reasoning, speed, and memory performance were assessed by a short form of the Berlin Intelligence Structure test. Two aspects of executive attention (sustained and selective attention) and speed of decision making were
measured by a continuous performance test, a flanker task, and a Hick task, respectively. Traditional structural equation modeling, representing the positive manifold by a g factor, as well as network analyses, investigating the differential effects of the two aspects of executive attention and speed of decision making on the specific correlations of the positive manifold, suggested that selective attention, sustained attention, and speed of decision making explained the common but not the unique portions of the positive manifold. Thus, we failed to provide evidence for POT’s assumption that the positive manifold is the result of overlapping domain-general processes. This does not mean
that domain-general processes other than those investigated here will not be able to show the pattern of results predicted by POT.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

56 since deposited on 28 Mar 2022
33 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item