Nanoindentation creep: The impact of water and artificial saliva storage on milled and 3D-printed resin composites.

Sasany, Rafat; Jamjoom, Faris Z; Uçar, Sultan Merve; Yilmaz, Burak (2024). Nanoindentation creep: The impact of water and artificial saliva storage on milled and 3D-printed resin composites. (In Press). Journal of prosthodontics Wiley 10.1111/jopr.13913

[img] Text
Journal_of_Prosthodontics_-_2024_-_Sasany_-_Nanoindentation_creep__The_impact_of_water_and_artificial_saliva_storage_on.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (563kB)

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the effects of artificial saliva and distilled water on the nanoindentation creep of different 3D-printed and milled CAD-CAM resin composites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Disk-shaped specimens were subtractively fabricated from polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (EN) and reinforced resin composite (B) and additively from resin composite (C) and hybrid resin composite (VS) using digital light processing (DLP). Specimens from each material were divided into two groups according to their storage conditions (artificial saliva or distilled water for 3 months). Creep was analyzed by nanoindentation testing. Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc tests, and independent t-test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The main effects of material and storage conditions, and their interaction were statistically significant on nanoindentation (p < 0.001). Storage condition had the greatest influence (partial eta squared ηP 2 = 0.370), followed by the material (ηP 2 = 0.359), and the interaction (ηP 2 = 0.329). The nanoindentation creep depths after artificial saliva storage ranged from 0.34 to 0.51 µm and from 0.50 to 0.87 µm after distilled water storage. One of the additively manufactured groups had higher nanoindentation creep depths in both storage conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

All specimens showed comparable performance after artificial saliva storage, but increased nanoindentation creep after distilled water storage for 3 months. The subtractive CAD-CAM blocks showed superior dimensional stability in terms of nanoindentation creep depths in both storage conditions. Additively manufactured composite resins had lower dimensional stability than one of the subtractively manufactured composites, which was demonstrated as having higher creep deformation and maximum recovery. However, after artificial saliva storage, one of the additively manufactured resins had dimensional stability similar to that of subtractively manufactured.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Yilmaz, Burak

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1532-849X

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

07 Aug 2024 10:36

Last Modified:

07 Aug 2024 13:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/jopr.13913

PubMed ID:

39105440

Uncontrolled Keywords:

3D‐printed resin CAD‐CAM materials additive manufacturing nanoindentation testing polymer‐infiltrated ceramic network subtractive manufacturing

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/199540

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199540

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback