Tietz, Silvia; Zwahlen, Marcel; Haghayegh Jahromi, Neda; Baden, Pascale; Lazarevic, Ivana; Enzmann, Gaby; Engelhardt, Britta (2016). Refined clinical scoring in comparative EAE studies does not enhance the chance to observe statistically significant differences. European journal of immunology, 46(10), pp. 2481-2483. Wiley-VCH 10.1002/eji.201546272
Text
Tietz EurJImmunol 2016_comment.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (556kB) |
||
|
Text
Tietz EurJImmunol 2016_comment_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (400kB) | Preview |
Considering the 3R rules of animal experimentation, we asked if refined scoring of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in mice improves documentation of clinical EAE allowing to perform a more powerful statistical analysis. Surprisingly, refined EAE scoring failed to improve statistical outcome comparing the overall disease courses between two groups of mice.